|
Sub:
Deep Blue vs. Kasparov
Date:
8/02/2003 10:23:53 AM Mountain Daylight Time
From: akaczrowski
To:
service@chess-poster.com
Against Deep Blue
in 1997, it is amazing to me that Gary Kasparov resigned. Also
amazing was the fact that Deep Blue decided to "sacrifice" its
Queen. It had to have seen that its Queen would be taken by the
Rook, but it did it anyways. It must have thought far deeper
into the game.
Basically, Garry resigned even though he still had these pieces:
Rook, Queen, Knight, and a Bishop.
The computer didn't have a Queen left.
I don't agree that the computer "trounced" Garry in any
way. It seems to me that Garry could've taken that Pawn on F5
with the Queen, but maybe this would've been bad 7 moves
later, because he was playing a super computer after all.
chess-poster.com
Hello,
You've
got the
game wrong. Deep Blue had
the
white pieces
and Kasparov
the
black
ones.
So, Kasparov sacrificed his Queen
and Deep Blue had a majority of pieces.
Thank you for visiting us.
chess-poster.com |
